One Dad's Plea to the Prez Candidates

Dear Senators Obama, Clinton, and
McCain,
Like many Americans, I have been
following the presidential race very closely this year. Indeed, this is a crucial point in our great
country's history. As you have pointed
out, the next president of the United
States will face unprecedented challenges
and decisions around the security, prosperity, and strategic direction of this
country. By now, we are all familiar
with your policy positions on the familiar topics of the day, and there's no
need to rehash those for the one millionth time again. However, as a concerned
dad, I would like to hear more about your vision and proposed solutions on key
strategic issues that will be most important when our children are old enough
to vote 10-15 years from now.
Yes, we all know how this works -
understandably so, only the most pressing (or well-lobbied) issues are dealt with in Washington. Those are the issues that lead to
re-election. The longer-term issues are
left for another day and another political leader to deal with. But some of these issues, while still only
emerging on the horizon, will impact our children more than anything we've been
talking about in this election. It's
like paying for college tuition - having the foresight to start a little
earlier avoids much bigger pain later.
So, I'm looking for a political
leader who will tackle the emerging issues of tomorrow. I'm looking for someone
who will have the political courage and foresight to fix these problems even
though every day Americans don't "feel the pain" yet. Just as we hold down our infants as they get their vaccinations, I would rather deal with a little pain now
than make our children face 100x that pain.
-
Invest in Preschool Education - Our country's future relies on the minds,
hearts, and spirits of our young people, but this isn't a bleeding heart
plea. Study after
study shows that the 3- to 4- year age is crucial. Their brains are
sponges, and if they learn how to learn at this crucial age, it puts them on
different trajectory for a lifetime. In
fact, research shows that economic returns for this kind of investment are huge
(one 40-year study cited an 800% ROI). It's not difficult to figure out how these
benefits would be played out. As a
recent economics Nobel Laureate wrote: "Early interventions for disadvantaged
children promote schooling, raise the quality of the work force, enhance the
productivity of schools, and reduce crime, teenage pregnancy, and welfare
dependency." We always talk about
investing in our future - this may need to be at the top of the list. Yes, it'll cost us something, but so does
sending my son to college - it's worth the investment.
-
Develop a China/Asia Strategy - If the 19th Century belonged
to Britain, the 20th
Century belonged to America. And all indications point to the fact that China owns the
21st Century. Yes, "Made in China" still
has its baggage. Yes, we still see scenes
of rural China
where old Chinese farmers with no teeth or electricity pose for pictures with
their sheep. Yes, they still have a lot
of problems from our Westernized perspective.
But make no mistake about it - China is the new superpower, and they're
taking us off our throne. They've hitched a nice ride from us over the
last 25 years, and rightfully so. But
there will come a day where we'll need to hitch a ride from them as well. Despite all of our differences, how will we
work with them to find creative and imaginative solutions to advance both our
countries forward? Let's not let hubris
get in the way of seeing this reality clearly.
-
Build upon America's key strength of
innovation. Leveraging our
strengths will be the key to our country's economic future. If you look at every successful organization
in the world, all of them plow their resources into their strongest areas. For
Apple, it's design. For Wal-Mart, it's cost
efficiency. For GE, it's managerial
talent. For Florida, it's the coastal geography. For America, it is innovation. Our culture of individualism and
entrepreneurship, our world-class universities & brain trusts, our
celebration of self-expression, and our supportive regulatory environment
provide an advantage over other country's that is not easily replicable. We need to bring this strength to the next
level. This is one of our key value-adds
to the world. As the United States heads toward a "M-shaped"
society, let's not stop at just creating any job for anybody. While those are important, I'm afraid that's
too short-sighted. Let's create jobs
that will be sustainable and valuable in the long run. We in this country have a talent for
innovation - help us take it to new heights.
-
Make Social Security and Medicare
sustainable - Every year, the
Treasury Secretary will set up a press conference about how both of these programs are going to be
insolvent by 2019 or so. We've all
probably seen the disturbing trend where the ratio of workers to retirees is
drastically falling. The next year, we'll
see the same graphs and hear the same rants.
Glenn Beck is right (no matter what you think of the guy) when he says
this is like a $53B asteroid plunging down to Earth. We can just continue in this state of denial
and make our kids pay the bill, or start doing something now. Yes, the Republicans want to reduce
benefits. Yes, the Democrats want to
raise taxes. I say let's find a
compromise and do both. This is exactly
like me saving for our kid's college tuition. I can put in $300/month starting
at age 1, or wait a few years and be forced to put in $800/month, or just tell
him college isn't worth it. The time is
now. Let's not make our kids pay for our
lack of foresight or courage.
-
Don't just solve the health care crisis,
solve the health crisis - A
big reason we have a health care crisis here is that we have a health
crisis. Sure, our health care system
needs fixing, but that's not getting at the root of the problem -- we are
simply not living healthy lives. And
those lifestyle choices are not just straining our individual productivity or
our healthcare system - they are straining our country's competitiveness in the
global market. In a few years, our
healthcare costs will be 20% of every dollar spent in the U.S. Every Ford built in the USA has $1,800 of health care costs built into
it versus $200 for a Japan-manufactured Toyota. How can we expect Ford to compete in the
long-run? All the American companies we
love and admire (and work for) could be single-handedly taken down by health
care costs. We need to find innovative ways
to push the cause of prevention (first step, don't call it prevention). Maybe we can learn something from the "truth" ad campaign that has got kids to
smoke less. Apply those learnings to staying
active and eating right.
- Work to avoid a global water crisis - Oil don't got nothing on water. Granted that's a stretch for the USA, but not for many other regions in the world in the next few decades. In fact as we speak, half the world's hospitals beds are being occupied by people with waterborne disease. Water may very well be our children's "climate change" issue. As a world leader, what can we do to preemptively address this problem before it becomes the impetus for regional warfare and instability?
All of you are parents also. So, you know how to keep one eye on the short-term
and one eye on the long-term. As
parents, our kids are casting votes for our re-election every day. Nonetheless, for the sake of our kids,
sometimes we're okay with losing a few votes to do the right thing in the long
run.
Thank you again for serving our
country. And best of luck with your hard-fought campaigns.
Tony Chen



Response to a proposal
Dr. Trey,
Your point is well-taken. The fundamental problem as I see it in our society is that families can barely sustain themselves on one income, unless the income is quite high - in which case this often means the "bread winner" works long hours, and probably spent a great deal of time in school (leading to heavy debt in many cases) to become a doctor, lawyer, etc.
There is something terribly wrong with a society that practically forces both parents to work outside the home and away from their children just to pay the taxes and regular expenses.
My wife hasn't worked since before our first son was born (he's nearly 3) and now with a second things are even more tight. We cut every corner we can, and I earn a good salary and excellent benefits.
I am a very strong supporter of Ron Paul, and have been studying his ideas for nearly 4 years. I would strongly recommend that you take time to understand his explanation of our economic system, including a thorough study of the Federal Reserve system. It is also critical to understand the dangers of letting government run school systems.
The short answer is that our society is in decline precisely because we have ignored the wisdom left to us by our nation's founders. Trying to police the world and run cradle-to-grave welfare systems will lead us to bankruptcy, if it has not already.
Tom
Well meaning, but...
There's a lot here to chew on, and some of it goes over well, some not so much. Still, we need to ask ourselves whether the responsibility for much of this lies with the government.
I agree with the pre-K investment for disadvantaged areas, particularly because poor and single-parent households can't make the time investment with the kids as easily. But my wife and I invest a lot of time on my (almost 2-year old) son, and that attention is well-repaid. I don't need federal intervention, and it would appall me to learn that tax dollars were being spent for relatively well-off families like mine.
The China point- well, yes, they better have plans to deal with China's growing clout, but I think you presume way, way too much. China will only reach the heights of Britain in the 19th or America in the 20th century if they liberalize their political system substantially. Their current growth is primarily input driven, rather than innovation or productivity driven. That will slacken if they can't find a way to evolve into a liberal democracy. If they do that, then our worries should be a lot less.
I agree with what you say about innovation, but be careful how you ask the gov't to solve it. We ought to have a more expansive immigration policy for H1-B visas, certainly, to keep the bright minds that our universities educate here in the US. Otherwise, the main way you facilitate innovation is to lower the regulatory and tax barriers to entrepreneurial risk, and keep them low.
Your entitlement point is entirely correct. Not sure of the exact mix of tax hike/benefit reduction, but it needs to be fixed. Yesterday.
I'd prefer to keep the government out of regulating our private behavior. The main problem in health care is the fact that employer-based insurance tends to create a disconnect between health care consumers and the payer, interfering with the price mechanism for regulating supply and demand. That also tends to freeze out individuals who are self- or uninsured, since those with insurance place higher-than-normal demands on the system, and raise the costs. Eliminating the absurd tax preference for employer-based insurance would encourge more individual choice, leading to disintermediation and, eventually, more rational healthcare choices.
The water issue is a big one, probably the most significant environmental issue today. However, I think you misdiagnose the problem. We have the technology to clean water for drinking. What these folks around the world need is the wherewithal to use that technology. The greatest help we can give them is to open up our markets, especially agricultural markets, to trade with poorer nations, to allow them to develop economies that can sustain clean water usage.
Trey, I think you're right about mothers taking time off to bond with their children in the first year. My wife did just that, and stayed home even longer because she loved it so much. I suspect it impacts that pre-K development point made above; schools are less important when parents are heavily involved with the kids. I tend to disagree that the government should subsidize it, though. I grew up with one working parent and a stay-at-home mom, and there were years (most of my early ones, in fact) when we could really have used the extra income. Ultimately, though, i think it was best for all of us, as a family, that my folks chose not to maximize income, but have my mom around when we were all young, just as my wife is currently doing. Everyone makes that decision for themselves, though, and I think it's one of those tough choices parents should be relied upon to make, without government intervention.
a proposal
For the record, I am a conservative who thinks that McCain is too liberal. Honest. But I am calling for finding a way to support mom's taking off a year to bond with their children. I do not know how it could be done, but I know that it should be done. Poor bonding in the first year sets children up for a bumpy ride that is expensive for the rest of society. It makes children's brains defective, and much of the damage cannot be undone. That is the science and truth of the matter. It is hard and harsh and literal.
I have no idea about how to make this happen, but I know that it has not happened for decades and the populations that had less time for mom to bond with the child before she went to work or the child went to daycare suffer while the populations that found a way for the infant to have time to bond thrive. The children of the former are addicted or incarcerated while the children of the latter work and pay taxes. That statement was simplified and overstated, it does not apply to specific individuals, but it is true in the general population when groups of thousands are considered. Sadly, bitterly true.
I cannot figure out the details, but I know the science, and the science says that this is crucial.
Trey
Drtrey3 Licensed Clinical Psychologist, Father of Four including 5 year old triplets
case in point
this newsweek article just came out today. case in point for #2 (and #3) above...
http://www.newsweek.com/id/135380/page/1
Post new comment